Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Complete"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(suggestion) |
m (→Reviewed: +reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ==Reviewed== |
+ | == Reviewed == |
If an article has been reviewed, attaining complete '''and''' reviewed status ([[Koolf]] is an example), the little message saying "It has yet to be reviewed." should not be displayed, I should think. But I don't know how to fix this. [[User:Hadhad|Hadhad]] ([[User talk:Hadhad|talk]]) 08:21, 16 May 2016 (MDT) |
If an article has been reviewed, attaining complete '''and''' reviewed status ([[Koolf]] is an example), the little message saying "It has yet to be reviewed." should not be displayed, I should think. But I don't know how to fix this. [[User:Hadhad|Hadhad]] ([[User talk:Hadhad|talk]]) 08:21, 16 May 2016 (MDT) |
||
| + | : this is because we've changed how we mark articles as reviewed; the reviewed=yes method is now depreciated in favour of the reviewer adding a signature which helps show how long ago the article was reviewed. They're still 'reviewed' but they require a re-review to verify that they're still complete. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 01:49, 17 May 2016 (MDT) |
||
Latest revision as of 07:49, 17 May 2016
Reviewed[edit]
If an article has been reviewed, attaining complete and reviewed status (Koolf is an example), the little message saying "It has yet to be reviewed." should not be displayed, I should think. But I don't know how to fix this. Hadhad (talk) 08:21, 16 May 2016 (MDT)
- this is because we've changed how we mark articles as reviewed; the reviewed=yes method is now depreciated in favour of the reviewer adding a signature which helps show how long ago the article was reviewed. They're still 'reviewed' but they require a re-review to verify that they're still complete. --Joe ST (talk) 01:49, 17 May 2016 (MDT)