◕
Difference between revisions of "Eighty's War"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "The '''Emuli-Tukari War''' was a military conflict on Roshar that sprung up during the time of the Alethi Vengeance Pact. The conflict began when the Emuli cla...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | The '''Emuli-Tukari War''' was a military conflict on [[Roshar]] that sprung up during the time of the [[Alethi]] [[Vengeance Pact]]. The conflict began when the [[Emuli]] claimed the city [[Sesemalex Dar]] as their capital city, and due to the city being a successful trading city, the [[Tukari]] wanted the city for themselves. The Emuli also claimed that the city was their ancestral homeland, and a gift from the [[Herald]]s, because the city's pattern is central to their religion.{{ref|b|twok|c|54}} |
+ | The '''Emuli-Tukari War''' was a military conflict on [[Roshar]] that sprung up during the time of the [[Alethi]] [[Vengeance Pact]]. The conflict began when the [[Emuli]] claimed the city [[Sesemalex Dar]] as their capital city, and due to the city being a successful trading city, the [[Tukari]] wanted the city for themselves. The Emuli also claimed that the city was their ancestral homeland, and a gift from the [[Herald]]s, because the city's pattern is central to their religion. The city is also believed to be one of the [[Dawncity|Dawncities]], which is likely another cause for the conflict.{{ref|b|twok|c|54}} |
== Notes == |
== Notes == |
Revision as of 04:44, 24 November 2012
The Emuli-Tukari War was a military conflict on Roshar that sprung up during the time of the Alethi Vengeance Pact. The conflict began when the Emuli claimed the city Sesemalex Dar as their capital city, and due to the city being a successful trading city, the Tukari wanted the city for themselves. The Emuli also claimed that the city was their ancestral homeland, and a gift from the Heralds, because the city's pattern is central to their religion. The city is also believed to be one of the Dawncities, which is likely another cause for the conflict.Cite error: Invalid <ref>
tag; refs with no name must have content
Notes