Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Scadrians"

From The Coppermind
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "== Organization by Era? == This section might benefit from being organized by era rather than being purely alphabetical. I don't know how hard that would be, but it would be a...")
 
m (+reply)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
This section might benefit from being organized by era rather than being purely alphabetical. I don't know how hard that would be, but it would be a bit more user friendly.
 
This section might benefit from being organized by era rather than being purely alphabetical. I don't know how hard that would be, but it would be a bit more user friendly.
 
[[User:Respawn1234|Respawn1234]] ([[User talk:Respawn1234|talk]]) 14:42, 31 January 2016 (MST)
 
[[User:Respawn1234|Respawn1234]] ([[User talk:Respawn1234|talk]]) 14:42, 31 January 2016 (MST)
  +
: Indeed there's a bunch of ways that we could be better categorizing groups of articles. It's a limitation of the wiki software that we haven't tried to address --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 01:25, 1 February 2016 (MST)

Latest revision as of 08:25, 1 February 2016

Organization by Era?[edit]

This section might benefit from being organized by era rather than being purely alphabetical. I don't know how hard that would be, but it would be a bit more user friendly. Respawn1234 (talk) 14:42, 31 January 2016 (MST)

Indeed there's a bunch of ways that we could be better categorizing groups of articles. It's a limitation of the wiki software that we haven't tried to address --Joe ST (talk) 01:25, 1 February 2016 (MST)