Page history
6 May 2024
14 July 2023
28 May 2023
16 January 2023
6 January 2023
→Intent: Slight wording change to emphasize the ambiguity. This being said, I do not think the wob being argued over is unclear in the meaning, nor do I understand deleting the line outright, rather than rewording it to be more in line with the wob.
m+2
Undo revision 174891 by 68.41.244.24 (talk) Reverting again. As mentioned the information given in the WoB is accurate. No need for removal. Take to talk.
+95
5 January 2023
Undo revision 174871 by Debarra (talk) It does NOT say that, it says he would be tempted by it, a very different thing
-95
Undo revision 174852 by 68.41.244.24 (talk) Reverting, wob says this is the Shard that he would have taken up, not that it was the one offered to him.
+95
Hoid was not offered Endowment, per https://wob.coppermind.net/events/47-firefight-portland-signing/#e676 at the time of 2015 we had not seen the shard Hoid could have taken up
-95
26 August 2022
2 June 2022
3 September 2021
17 August 2021
16 August 2021
25 March 2021
16 March 2021
14 February 2021
25 January 2021
14 January 2021
10 January 2021
7 January 2021
3 January 2021
23 December 2020
25 November 2020
22 November 2020
You tried to do this before and it was removed; the infobox is not intended to be a comprehensive list of every appearance or detail of something
m-28
no edit summary
+28
30 October 2020
26 October 2020
23 September 2020
20 August 2020
15 April 2020
20 August 2019
27 July 2019
3 April 2019
A dye's potency in awakening has nothing to do with its source.
-163
→The Tears of Edgli
+40
→The Tears of Edgli
→The Tears of Edgli
+1
→The Tears of Edgli
+122