Difference between revisions of "Talk:Preservation"

From The Coppermind
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m (woops)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Ruin/Preservation -> Harmony ==
 
== Ruin/Preservation -> Harmony ==
I think it is important to note that although Ruin and Preservation have merged to a certain extent to form Harmony, they still exist as distinct entities ([[wotdb:642#10|Were Ruin and Preservation two shards or one?]]) -- WeiryWaiter
+
I think it is important to note that although Ruin and Preservation have merged to a certain extent to form Harmony, they still exist as distinct entities ([[wotdb:642#10|Were Ruin and Preservation two shards or one?]]) -- WeiryWriter
 
: Yes, I think the links between these three shards really could do with a lot of work, since as far as I can tell, their articles seem fairly distinct at the moment. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 05:47, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 
: Yes, I think the links between these three shards really could do with a lot of work, since as far as I can tell, their articles seem fairly distinct at the moment. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 05:47, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:47, 8 May 2013

Ruin/Preservation -> Harmony

I think it is important to note that although Ruin and Preservation have merged to a certain extent to form Harmony, they still exist as distinct entities (Were Ruin and Preservation two shards or one?) -- WeiryWriter

Yes, I think the links between these three shards really could do with a lot of work, since as far as I can tell, their articles seem fairly distinct at the moment. --Joe ST (talk) 05:47, 8 May 2013 (UTC)